The Family Lore of Bessie’s Brothers and Sisters

One of my most cherished family photos is the professional photo of my great- grandmother Bessie Beauchamp and her siblings Fred, Frank, and Lillian. I fondly recall seeing this photo on top of my grandmother’s roll top desk and hearing the sad story early on that Bessie’s brothers and sisters died after the photo was taken during the Spanish Flu pandemic of 1918.

Over the years the story around the picture changed a bit and eventually settled to become that Bessie (a solemn looking 8 year old in the photo) and her three siblings were the sole survivors of a large family that included many children who died during the Spanish Flu pandemic of 1918.

And like most instances of family legends or lore, some of this story is true and some is not. Either way, as I dug in and began to uncover the truth behind the family photo, I discovered records that allowed me to know much more about my family that I ever thought possible.

Truth be Told

As it turns out, my great-grandmother Bessie Beauchamp did come from a large family of at least eight children with just five of them living to adulthood: Fred, Frank, Bessie, Lillian and Mary. (Mary was born in 1905, presumably after this photo was taken.)

Two other children, and possibly a third, have been identified as Bessie’s siblings through census, cemetery, and death records of Chicago.

1900 Census Residence

In 1900, Henry and his family consisting of his wife Stella, and children, Fred, Frank, Elizabeth and Lillian, are enumerated at 173 W. 16th Street in an area known as West Town in Chicago. Henry is listed as being born in Canada and his occupation is listed as Carpenter. His sons Fred and Frank are listed as attending school.

Census records don’t tell us how long Henry and his family lived at this residence; however, while researching Chicago death records, the following death certificates list 173 W. 16th the residence at time of death:

  • 65 year-old female Elizabeth Beauchamp died March 2, 1898 at 173 W. 16th Street. The cause of death is listed as bronchi-pneumonia. She is buried at Calvery Cemetery. This is assumed to be Henry’s mother, and Bessie’s grandmother.
  • 2 1/2 year-old child Henry Bouchamp on January 18, 1899 at 173 W. 16th Street. The cause of death was Scarlet Fever & Diptheria. The child is buried in Waldheim cemetery.
  • Exactly two years later, on January 18, 1901, City of Chicago Death records list the death of Eddie Beauchamp, two-month old child living at 173 W. 16th street. Burial is at Calvary Cemetery.
  • The next day, on January 19, 1901, City of Chicago Death records list the death of Joe Bouchamp, two-month old child living at 173 W. 16th street. Burial is also listed as Calvary Cemetery.

The above records point to the connection between the residence of 173 W. 16th street and the family name of Beauchamp as proof that Henry, Eddie and Joseph were the children of Henry and Stella and Elizabeth the mother of Henry. However, there is always rooms for doubt (and additional research!)

Another Connection

Luckily for us we have another record for Eddie and Joseph that tie them directly to Henry living at 173 W. 16th Street and that is their baptism record.

The record is from Sacred Heart Parish located at 818 W. 19th street and within walking distance of 173 W. 16th street. The baptism records lists the “in private baptism” of Joseph and Edward, as the sons of Henrico Beauchamp. A notation on the baptism notes in latin “mortue sunt” translated as “they are dead”.

Henry is an Unknown

Without any additional primary source records, Henry’s parentage is a little bit more uncertain. It’s entirely possible that one of Bessie’s uncles was also living, or staying, with Bessie and her family at 173 W. 16th Street when they lost a child in 1899. Here’s why:

  • Henry (d. 1899) is buried at Waldheim and not Calvary cemetery where his brothers are buried
  • Henry Jr’s death certificate in January of 1899 at the age of 2 years and 6 months, place his birth date at July of 1896. The problem is we have Bessie’s own birth known as Aug/September of 1896. (Her birth month/year in the 1900 census is listed as August of 1896.) Either Bessie was Henry Jr.’s twin or Henry had different parents living at 173 W. 16th street in 1899.

The Search continues

In conclusion, we now know that Bessie did in fact have at least two, possibly three, young siblings die when very young. Within a few years after this photo being taken, another sibling, Mary “Dolly” Beauchamp, was born in 1905 for a total of eight known Beauchamp children being born to Bessie’s parents Henry and Stella. And to complicate things even more, in 1910, Bessie’s mother Stella reported to the census taker that she was in fact the mother of 12 children, with five now living.

Truth is we may never know the names and dates of the missing children. My hope is that as I continue to unravel the stories of the Beauchamp family, including why there are no birth or baptism records for any of the five surviving children, we’ll finally know the true story of Bessie’s siblings.

Favorite Find

I’m a little behind (already!) on the 52 Ancestor challenge and that’s because the writing prompt is a bit stressful for me. The prompt is “Favorite Find”.

Nope, I can’t do it. I cannot pick ONE favorite find. All of my finds are hard-earned research nuggets that deserve the spotlight. Therefore for this homework assignment I am going to highlight my most recent favorite find.

My most recent favorite find is mention of my Dad in a Chicago southside newspaper titled the “Economist”.

The newspaper headline reads “11 sets of Area Twins Are Feted” and goes on to report that the Chicago Public High School graduating class of 1960 had 68 sets of twins graduating with eleven sets of the twins attending the semi-annual twins’ reception held in the school board’s assembly room on N. LaSalle street.

According to the article, my Dad and his twin David attended the event, along with Barbara and Betty Schaefer, who were also representatives from Morgan Park High School.

It’s these little stories that make my research so fulfilling. Dad was always super proud that he was a twin and secretly I’m sure he wanted twin grandchildren. (His grandmother Antoinette was a twin!) While that did not happen, the genetic disposition is still there (I believe) and time will tell if this genetic trait will get passed down.

52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks

A few years ago I had great intentions of participating in the 52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks challenge created and maintained by Amy Johnson Crow. Yeah, I failed.

Why did I fail? I’m not really sure except recently I’ve discovered that I struggle with Executive Functioning skills required to plan & break down tasks into bite size chunks. I also am easily distracted by bright, shiny objects a.k.a. new databases, ancestry “hints” and dna technology.

So I’m at a complete loss as whether I should commit to the 52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks Challenge. According to the “Let’s Get Started” email that Amy sent out, I don’t have to worry if I can’t do all 52 weeks because “anything that you do will be more than what you had before you started”. True enough. Here’s my start:

This week’s prompt is “Foundation”.

Merriem-Webster defines “Foundation” as “a basis (such as a tenet, principle, or axiom) upon which something stands or is supported” which leads me to think not about a specific ancestor, but rather my entire tree and the research behind it. For me high quality, well-documented research is the foundation of my tree. It always has been. I will not add a person or relationship to my tree until I have the genealogical proof that he or she belongs in my tree. I love sources. I love documents. My dopamine seeking brain will only move on to another task if I have discovered and documented the proof I am looking for.

Over the years I have accumulated alot of proof. Newspaper clippings, death records, marriage records. Hundreds of documents that sit on my hard-drive collecting dust. These documents represent the Foundation of my tree and it is my intention to use the 52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks Challenge to bring these documents to light.

Matilda Peterson Gretzinger

From the Johann Gobert photo collection.

From the Johann Gobert photo collection.

My lofty goal of writing short biographies of each of the chosen 52 ancestors is proving to be more difficult than I first thought.  Why?  Well, this week the ancestor I chose to write about is Matilda Peterson Gretzinger, my husband’s great-grandmother.  However, when I went to her record in my database, I found it incomplete. Very little data with incomplete citations.  Not even her obituary.

Which leads me to my current state of frustration.  Is the mission of this 52 week challenge supposed to allow me to highlight 52 ancestors or is the mission supposed to point out holes in my family tree which essentially leads to more in-depth and properly cited research?

Since this is my blog and my challenge, I choose both!

So here is this week’s post:

Matilda Peterson Gretzinger was born in February of 1889, the daughter of John and Anna Peterson.   The first record I have of Matilda is the 1900 census in which she is living in the Town of Matteson in Waupaca County, Wisconsin.  She is eleven years old and is listed as being “at school”.  Other members of the household include seven brothers & sisters and one half-sister, Mary Euhardy.  (Mary was the daughter of Peter Euhardy, Anna Hormish’s first husband).

At this point I don’t have detailed information on the Peterson family’s life in rural Waupaca county in 1900, but we do know that Matilda’s father was a farmer and more than likely his children attended a one room school with farm chores to keep them busy at home.

One Room Schoolhouse in Matteson. Credit: Wisconsin Historical Society. Image ID: 76131

One Room Schoolhouse in Matteson. Credit: Wisconsin Historical Society. Image ID: 76131

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jump ahead ten years to the 1910 census and we find Matilda still living in Matteson, Waupaca County with her parents and siblings.  Her older sister Anna is not living with the family, nor is her half-sister Mary.  We can only assume that they have married and have families of their own.  Speaking of getting married.  In 1910, at age 21, one has to wonder if Matilda has yet met the handsome John Gretzinger whom she will marry two years later at the age of 23?

Source: Memories of Forest County. Wisconsin State Historical Society.

Source: Memories of Forest County. Wisconsin State Historical Society.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note:  The photo above lists the marriage date as 1911, yet Matilda’s obituary lists her marriage date at October 28, 1912.  (A research trip to Waupaca county is required!)

Shortly after their marriage, John and Matilda moved to rural Forest county and started their own family farm.  By 1920, the family has grown to include children Dorothy, Roy, Earl and Ann.  The exact location of the farm enumerated in 1920 is not known. It appears that the farm was enumerated on Range Line Road in the Town of Crandon with the Gretzingers nearest neighbors being the Ernest Feight and Isaac Dehart families.  Whether this location was the “old farm” now located on Linneman Road remains to be seen.

John and Matilda lived in rural Forest county near Argonne for approximately 30 years.  Their ten children (Dorothy, Roy, Earl, Ann, Ruth, Frank, Delores, Matilda (Tillie), John and William) and eventual grandchildren and great-grandchildren must have kept their lives pretty busy with family celebrations, get-togethers and the daily life a large family farm.  (The only known tragedy occuring when Matilda and John lost their son, Roy, on July 4, 1955, when he drowned in Lake Metonga during a July 4th celebration.)

In 1942, John and Matilda returned to Clintonville, eventually making their last move to Shawano a few years before Matilda’s death in 1961.  They are buried together in Graceland Cemetery in Clintonville.

Source: www.findagrave.com. Moo, Esq. (Karen) 6/21/2013.

Source: www.findagrave.com. Moo, Esq. (Karen)
6/21/2013.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Magdalena Laskowski Jochim (Week 1)

I’m a big fan of well-written historical fiction.  It’s how I learn history.  No dates or names to memorize just characters to meet.  I’ve been searching for a historical fiction title that tells me a little bit more about the history of Poland since I am clueless about the country’s leaders and peoples prior to WWII.   I found the book titled Push Not the River by James Conroyd Martin. I’m about half way done with the book and I’ll save my review for later; however, each chapter of the book starts with a Polish Proverb.  It was the proverb found in the Prologue that prompted me to write about my ancestor Magdelena Laskowski Jachim.

Wherever you go,
you can never leave yourself behind.
–Polish Proverb

Magdalena Laskowski Jachim was born in Liverpool, England about 1874, the daughter of Michael and Katherine Laskowski.  She married Josef Jachim (also spelled Yockem) in Liverpool in 1889 and they emigrated to the United States in 1893.

This clipping shows the Yockem (Jachim) family arriving in the United States via the port of Philadelphia in April of 1893,  They are traveling to meet Maggie's sister Frances Wrabel in Chicago.

This clipping shows the Yockem (Jachim) family arriving in the United States via the port of Philadelphia in April of 1893, They are traveling to meet Maggie’s sister Frances Wrabel in Chicago.

Even though Magdalena was born in Liverpool, England,  I consider her a Polish ancestor.  According to my research, her parents left Poland shortly after her oldest sister Frances was born in Poland.  The family lived in the neighborhood of Toxteth Park in Liverpool for approximately 20 years as Polish immigrants.

This photo was taken at her granddaughter Clara Cygan’s wedding to Frank Koranda.  My father only remembers a brief visit to his great grandmother Magdalena’s home even though she lived until the age of 75 passing away in August of 1949 when he was seven years old  She is buried in St. Adalbert’s cemetery in the town of Niles in Cook County, Illinois.

 

52 Ancestors Challenge

I’m up for the challenge.  If you review this blog you will see that I am very hit or miss with my postings.  And if I’m honest its more miss than hit.  But this morning while reading the Ancestry.com blog I got kinda excited.  Why?  Because I already started this challenge and didn’t know it!

One of my other passions is Scrapbooking and lately I’ve been creating heritage layouts that include photos and information about my ancestors.  Which is exactly what I need to do with this blog!

So there it is.  I’m going to take on the 52 week challenge but not only am I going to blog about my genealogy pursuits, but I’m going to create scrapbook pages to go along with the blog.  At the end of 2014, I will have shared with my family information about 52 of our shared ancestors (one of the reasons why I blog) and I will have at least a 52 paged heritage scrapbook!

I am not overwhelmed.  I am not overwhelmed.  I am not overwhelmed.